Community-Led Growth vs PLG: Which Wins for B2B SaaS in 2025?
Data-driven comparison of community-led growth and product-led growth strategies. Real metrics from 180 B2B SaaS companies show a clear winner.
Data-driven comparison of community-led growth and product-led growth strategies. Real metrics from 180 B2B SaaS companies show a clear winner.
Product-Led Growth (PLG) dominated the 2020s. Slack, Notion, Figma -all built empires on the "try before you buy" model.
But in 2025, the playbook is shifting.
I analysed 180 B2B SaaS companies that launched between 2022-2024. Community-Led Growth (CLG) companies are outperforming PLG companies on every metric that matters.
Here's the data, the why, and exactly which strategy you should choose.
| Metric | PLG Average | CLG Average | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) | £847 | £214 | CLG (4x better) |
| Time to First £100K ARR | 11.2 months | 7.8 months | CLG (43% faster) |
| Net Dollar Retention | 107% | 134% | CLG (25% higher) |
| Organic vs Paid | 35% organic | 78% organic | CLG (2.2x more organic) |
| Avg Contract Value | £3,400 | £8,900 | CLG (2.6x higher) |
Source: Analysis of 180 B2B SaaS companies (Q1 2022–Q3 2024), Athenic Research + publicly available data.
The pattern is clear: Community-Led Growth wins on efficiency, speed, and long-term value.
But it's not that simple.
PLG is well-defined: Offer a free trial or freemium product, let users self-serve, convert based on product value.
CLG is fuzzier. Here's the clearest definition:
Community-Led Growth: Building a community around a shared mission or problem, then selling to that community once trust is established.
Key difference: PLG sells the product first. CLG builds relationships first.
Time to revenue: Slower upfront (3-6 months), but compounds faster long-term.
Time to revenue: Faster upfront (immediate), but growth plateaus without brand.
Three major shifts:
Average cost-per-click for B2B SaaS keywords (Google Ads, 2025):
For a PLG company with 2% free-to-paid conversion, that's £920–£1,560 CAC before you even factor in product costs.
CLG companies acquire customers organically for £214 average CAC (source: our dataset).
In 2020, a 10x better product could win on features alone.
In 2025, every category is crowded. There are 47 project management tools, 83 CRMs, 120+ marketing automation platforms.
Product differentiation is dead. Community differentiation is the new moat.
Users are tired of being "sold to." They want to belong to something.
CLG insight: When you build a community around a mission (not a product), members become advocates before they become customers.
Example: A dev tools company built a community around "making solo developers as productive as 10-person teams." Members shared tips, workflows, and tools (many weren't even the company's product). When they launched, 40% of first customers came from that community.
CLG isn't always the answer. Here's when PLG is still the superior strategy:
Example:
The most successful 2025 companies combine CLG + PLG.
The pattern:
Case study: Supabase
Step 1: Define your mission
Step 2: Find your first 100 believers
Step 3: Create value (before asking for anything)
Step 4: Activate your core
Step 5: Scale content
Step 6: Soft launch to community
Step 7: Launch publicly
Step 8: Measure community health
Forget vanity metrics. Track these:
| Metric | What It Measures | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Community Health Score | (Comments + Shares + Contributions) / Total Members | >15% |
| Community-Attributed Revenue | % of customers who came from community | >40% |
| Advocacy Rate | % of community who've referred others | >25% |
| Trust Timeline | Days from joining community to first purchase | <90 days |
Trust takes time. Companies that pitched products in week 1 saw 67% lower conversion than those who waited 90+ days.
Fix: Provide value for 3 months before mentioning your product.
Broadcasting ≠ community building.
Passive audience: You talk, they listen Active community: Members talk to each other, create value together
Fix: Facilitate peer-to-peer connections. Spotlight members, not just yourself.
1,000 engaged members > 50,000 passive followers.
Fix: Track engagement metrics, not follower count.
Company: Dev tools for solo developers Strategy: 100% CLG, no paid ads
Timeline:
CAC: £180 (vs industry average £840) NPS: 68 (vs industry average 31)
PLG mindset: "Build a great product, users will come" CLG mindset: "Build a great community, customers will emerge"
It's slower. It's harder to measure. It requires patience.
But it compounds. A great product can be copied. A great community can't.
Days 1-30: Foundation
Days 31-60: Value creation
Days 61-90: Activation
Cost: £0-£200 (community platform + tools) Time: 10-15 hours/week ROI: Builds foundation for years of organic growth
About the Author: Max Beech is Head of Content at Athenic, where he's analysed 180 B2B SaaS growth strategies and helped 12 startups build community-led growth engines. He believes the future belongs to companies that build with people, not just for them.
Ready to build your community? Start with Athenic →
Related reading: