Reviews28 Oct 202510 min read

Cursor vs GitHub Copilot vs Codeium: AI Coding Assistants Compared

Head-to-head comparison of Cursor, GitHub Copilot, and Codeium -evaluating code completion, chat features, pricing, and which AI coding assistant best fits your workflow.

MB
Max Beech
Head of Content

TL;DR

  • Cursor: Best for full-file editing and codebase-aware suggestions ($20/month).
  • GitHub Copilot: Most mature, excellent completion, strong ecosystem ($10-20/month).
  • Codeium: Free alternative with good autocomplete but weaker chat features (free/$15/month).

Feature comparison

FeatureCursorGitHub CopilotCodeium
AutocompleteExcellentExcellentGood
Chat/Q&AExcellentGoodFair
Multi-file editsExcellentFairPoor
Codebase contextExcellentGoodFair
Supported IDEsCursor (VS Code fork)VS Code, JetBrains, NeovimVS Code, JetBrains, more
Pricing$20/mo$10/mo (individual), $19/mo (business)Free / $15/mo Pro

Cursor

Best for: Developers who want AI-first editing experience

Strengths:

  • Cmd+K inline editing feels native
  • Excellent codebase awareness (uses full context)
  • Multi-file refactoring works well
  • Chat understands project structure

Weaknesses:

  • Requires switching from VS Code to Cursor IDE
  • $20/month more expensive than Copilot
  • Smaller community than VS Code

Verdict: 4.5/5 - Best overall for serious AI-assisted development.

GitHub Copilot

Best for: Most developers, especially those already in GitHub ecosystem

Strengths:

  • Most mature product (3+ years in market)
  • Excellent autocomplete accuracy
  • Deep VS Code integration
  • Works in JetBrains, Neovim
  • GitHub integration (understands issues/PRs)

Weaknesses:

  • Chat less sophisticated than Cursor
  • Multi-file edits require manual coordination
  • Privacy concerns (Microsoft-owned)

Verdict: 4/5 - Solid choice for most developers, best value.

Codeium

Best for: Budget-conscious developers, students

Strengths:

  • Free tier is genuinely useful
  • Good autocomplete (80% as good as Copilot)
  • Supports many IDEs
  • Privacy-focused (self-hosted options)

Weaknesses:

  • Chat feature underwhelming
  • Codebase context less accurate
  • Slower suggestion speed
  • Fewer supported languages

Verdict: 3.5/5 - Great free option, but paid competitors offer better experience.

Pricing

ToolFree tierPaid tierEnterprise
Cursor-$20/monthCustom
CopilotStudents/OSS$10/month (individual), $19/month (business)$39/user/month
CodeiumYes (unlimited)$15/month ProCustom

Use case recommendations

Choose Cursor if:

  • You do complex refactoring frequently
  • AI-assisted development is core to your workflow
  • You're willing to switch IDEs
  • Budget allows $20/month

Choose Copilot if:

  • You want proven, stable tool
  • Already use GitHub ecosystem
  • Need JetBrains/Neovim support
  • Want best value ($10/month)

Choose Codeium if:

  • Budget is tight (free tier)
  • Privacy-conscious (self-hosted option)
  • Autocomplete is primary need
  • Don't need advanced chat features

FAQs

Can I use multiple tools together?

Not recommended -autocomplete conflicts. Pick one.

Which has best Python support?

All three excellent for Python. Cursor slightly ahead for multi-file Python refactoring.

Do they work offline?

No, all require internet connection for AI inference.

Which respects code privacy most?

Codeium offers self-hosted option. Cursor and Copilot process code in cloud.

Can I try before buying?

All offer trials: Cursor (14 days), Copilot (30 days), Codeium (unlimited free tier).

Summary

Cursor leads on AI-first editing experience and codebase awareness. GitHub Copilot offers best value and ecosystem integration. Codeium provides solid free alternative. For professional developers, Cursor or Copilot recommended; students/hobbyists should try Codeium free tier first.

Winner: Cursor for power users, GitHub Copilot for most developers.