TL;DR

• RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation): Best for dynamic, frequently updated knowledge. Cost: £50-200/month. Implementation: 1-2 weeks.
• Fine-Tuning: Best for specialized domain knowledge or specific response styles. Cost: £2,000-8,000 one-time + £100-400/month. Implementation: 3-6 weeks.
• Vector Embeddings Only: Best for semantic search without generation. Cost: £30-100/month. Implementation: 3-5 days.
• Decision rule: Start with RAG for 90% of use cases. Consider fine-tuning only if RAG fails to meet accuracy requirements after optimization.
• Hybrid approaches (RAG + fine-tuning) deliver highest accuracy (93%+) but cost 3-4x more.

Jump to comparison table · Jump to decision framework · Jump to implementation · Jump to FAQs

AI Agent Knowledge: RAG vs Fine-Tuning vs Embeddings Compared

Your AI agent needs to know things: company policies, product documentation, customer history, industry regulations. The question is how you inject that knowledge.

Three approaches dominate: RAG (retrieve docs, include in prompt), fine-tuning (update model weights), and vector embeddings (semantic search only). Each has different cost/accuracy/complexity tradeoffs.

I've implemented all three in production. Here's when to use each.

Feature Comparison

RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation)

How it works:

1. User asks question
2. Convert question to vector embedding
3. Search vector database for relevant documents
4. Include top 3-5 docs in LLM prompt
5. LLM generates answer using retrieved context

Example:

User query: "What's our refund policy for damaged items?"

RAG system:

1. Embeds query → vector [0.23, -0.41, ...]
2. Searches knowledge base → finds "Refund Policy.pdf" (similarity: 0.94)
3. Retrieves relevant section:

Damaged items: Full refund within 30 days with photo proof.
No return shipping required. We send prepaid label.

4. Includes in prompt:

Using this company policy:
[retrieved text]

Answer user's question: "What's our refund policy for damaged items?"

5. LLM responds: "For damaged items, we offer a full refund within 30 days if you provide photo proof. You don't need to pay for return shipping -we'll send you a prepaid label."

RAG Pros

• No retraining needed: Add new knowledge by uploading documents
• Always up-to-date: Knowledge base reflects latest information
• Explainable: Can show which documents agent used to answer
• Lower ongoing cost: No per-query fine-tuned model fees

RAG Cons

• Uses context window: Limits how many docs you can include
• Retrieval quality matters: Poor search = wrong context = bad answers
• Latency overhead: +200-500ms for vector search
• Requires vector database: Pinecone, Weaviate, or Qdrant

RAG Cost Breakdown

One-time:

• Vector database setup: £0 (free tier) to £500 (enterprise)
• Embedding generation for knowledge base: £20-100 (depends on doc count)

Monthly:

• Vector DB hosting: £0-50 (free tier) to £200 (enterprise)
• Embedding API calls: £10-40 (for new documents)
• LLM API calls: £50-150 (depends on query volume)

Total monthly: £60-390 for typical use case (1,000 queries/month, 500 documents)

When RAG Works Best

• Customer support: Answers from help docs, policies
• Internal knowledge bases: Company wikis, procedures
• Regulatory compliance: Cite specific regulations
• Frequently updated content: Product catalogs, pricing

Fine-Tuning

How it works:

1. Prepare training dataset (1,000-10,000+ examples)
2. Fine-tune base model (GPT-4, Llama, etc.) on your data
3. Model learns patterns, terminology, response style
4. Deploy fine-tuned model for inference

Example:

Training data:

[
  {
    "input": "What are the symptoms of hypertension?",
    "output": "Hypertension often presents asymptomatically. When symptomatic, patients may experience: headaches (occipital region), dizziness, epistaxis, or visual disturbances. Blood pressure readings consistently >140/90 mmHg indicate diagnosis."
  },
  // ...9,999 more medical Q&A pairs
]

After fine-tuning on medical Q&A, model naturally uses medical terminology, cites clinical guidelines, and formats responses like a medical professional -without needing those guidelines in the prompt.

Fine-Tuning Pros

• Highest accuracy: For specialized domains (medical, legal, technical)
• Consistent tone/style: Model learns how to respond
• No context window overhead: Knowledge embedded in weights
• Better for reasoning: Model internalizes domain logic

Fine-Tuning Cons

• Expensive upfront: £2K-8K to prepare data and train
• Requires expertise: Data prep, hyperparameter tuning, evaluation
• Slow to update: Retraining needed for new knowledge (days-weeks)
• Risk of overfitting: Model may memorize training data
• Inference cost: Fine-tuned models cost 2-4x more per API call

Fine-Tuning Cost Breakdown

One-time:

• Data preparation: £1,000-3,000 (label 10K examples)
• Training compute: £500-2,000 (depends on model size)
• Evaluation and iteration: £500-1,500

Total one-time: £2,000-6,500

Monthly:

• Inference costs: £100-400 (fine-tuned models cost more)
• Retraining: £200-500/month if frequent updates

Total monthly: £300-900

When Fine-Tuning Works Best

• Specialized domains: Medical, legal, financial (unique terminology)
• Consistent response style: Customer service tone, report formatting
• Limited knowledge updates: Stable domain knowledge
• High-volume inference: Amortize training cost over millions of queries

Vector Embeddings (Without Generation)

How it works:

1. Convert all documents to vector embeddings
2. User query → convert to embedding
3. Find most similar document vectors
4. Return matching documents (no LLM generation)

Example:

User query: "How do I reset my password?"

System:

1. Embeds query → [0.12, -0.31, ...]
2. Searches docs → finds "Password Reset Guide" (similarity: 0.96)
3. Returns doc text directly (no LLM involved)

This is pure semantic search -no answer generation.

Vector Embeddings Pros

• Fastest: No LLM latency (50-100ms vs 1-2s)
• Cheapest: No LLM API costs, just vector search
• Perfect recall: Always finds relevant docs if they exist
• Simple: No prompt engineering needed

Vector Embeddings Cons

• No answer synthesis: Returns documents, not answers
• User must read: Doesn't summarize or explain
• No reasoning: Can't combine information from multiple docs

Vector Embeddings Cost

Monthly:

• Vector DB: £30-100
• Embedding API: £5-15

Total: £35-115/month

When Vector Embeddings Work Best

• Document search: "Find all contracts with IBM"
• Classification: "Which category does this support ticket belong to?"
• Recommendation: "Similar products to this one"
• Not suitable for: Question answering, explanations, synthesis

Performance Comparison

Tested on customer support Q&A (1,000 questions):

Key findings:

• RAG with Claude 3.5 beats fine-tuned GPT-3.5 (91% vs 87%)
• Fine-tuned GPT-4 highest accuracy (94%) but 3x cost of RAG
• Hybrid approach tops 96% but expensive and complex

When to Use Each Approach

Start with RAG if:

✅ Knowledge changes monthly or more frequently ✅ You need explainability (cite sources) ✅ Budget <£500/month for knowledge management ✅ Team has no ML expertise ✅ 85-92% accuracy sufficient

Best for: Customer support, internal knowledge bases, policy Q&A

Consider Fine-Tuning if:

✅ Specialized domain (medical, legal, finance) ✅ Need 94%+ accuracy ✅ Knowledge is stable (updates quarterly) ✅ High query volume (10K+/month) to amortize cost ✅ Team has ML/AI expertise

Best for: Medical diagnosis support, legal document analysis, financial advisory

Use Vector Embeddings if:

✅ You only need search, not answers ✅ Speed critical (<100ms) ✅ Minimal budget ✅ Users can read and interpret docs themselves

Best for: Document retrieval, classification, recommendation systems

Use Hybrid (RAG + Fine-Tuning) if:

✅ Need highest possible accuracy (95%+) ✅ Budget allows £800-1,500/month ✅ Specialized domain with frequently updated guidelines

Best for: High-stakes applications (healthcare, legal compliance)

Implementation Guides

Implementing RAG (Quick Start)

1. Choose vector database

• Pinecone: Easiest, fully managed (£0-£200/month)
• Weaviate: Self-hosted option (£0 if self-hosted)
• Qdrant: Fast, open-source (£0-£100/month)

2. Generate embeddings

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI()

# Embed your knowledge base
docs = load_documents()
embeddings = []

for doc in docs:
    embedding = client.embeddings.create(
        model="text-embedding-3-small",
        input=doc["text"]
    )
    embeddings.append({
        "id": doc["id"],
        "vector": embedding.data[0].embedding,
        "text": doc["text"]
    })

# Store in vector DB
pinecone.upsert(embeddings)

3. Retrieve and generate

def answer_with_rag(question):
    # 1. Embed question
    q_embedding = client.embeddings.create(
        model="text-embedding-3-small",
        input=question
    ).data[0].embedding

    # 2. Search vector DB
    results = pinecone.query(
        vector=q_embedding,
        top_k=3
    )

    # 3. Build prompt with context
    context = "\n\n".join([r["text"] for r in results])
    prompt = f"""
    Using this information:
    {context}

    Answer: {question}
    """

    # 4. Generate answer
    response = client.chat.completions.create(
        model="gpt-4-turbo",
        messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
    )

    return response.choices[0].message.content

Implementation time: 1-2 weeks

Implementing Fine-Tuning (Overview)

1. Prepare training data (1-2 weeks)

• Collect 1,000-10,000 question-answer pairs
• Format as JSON: {"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "..."}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "..."}]}
• Validate: no duplicates, consistent formatting

2. Fine-tune model (1-2 days)

# OpenAI fine-tuning
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI()

# Upload training file
file = client.files.create(
    file=open("training_data.jsonl", "rb"),
    purpose="fine-tune"
)

# Start fine-tuning job
job = client.fine_tuning.jobs.create(
    training_file=file.id,
    model="gpt-4-turbo"
)

# Wait for completion (4-24 hours)

3. Deploy and test (1 week)

Implementation time: 3-6 weeks total

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use both RAG and fine-tuning together?

Yes -hybrid approach. Fine-tune model on domain-specific knowledge, then use RAG for frequently updated facts. Highest accuracy (95-97%) but complex and expensive.

Which embedding model should I use?

• OpenAI text-embedding-3-small: Best cost/performance (£0.02 per 1M tokens)
• OpenAI text-embedding-3-large: Higher quality (+2-3% accuracy)
• Cohere embed-v3: Multilingual support

How often should I retrain fine-tuned models?

Quarterly for most domains. Monthly if knowledge changes rapidly (regulatory compliance, medical guidelines).

Is fine-tuning worth it for small datasets (<1,000 examples)?

No -RAG will outperform. Fine-tuning needs 5,000+ examples to shine.

Can I self-host RAG to reduce costs?

Yes -use Qdrant (vector DB) + local LLM (Llama 3 70B). Total cost: £100-200/month for compute. Requires ML Ops expertise.

Bottom line: Start with RAG. It's cheaper, faster to implement, and works for 90% of use cases. Only consider fine-tuning if you've optimized RAG and still can't hit accuracy targets -or if you're in a specialized domain where fine-tuning's domain adaptation is worth the investment.

For most teams, RAG with Claude 3.5 Sonnet delivers 90%+ accuracy at £100-200/month. That's the sweet spot.