Reviews3 Oct 20259 min read

Notion AI vs Obsidian vs Roam: Knowledge Management for AI Builders

Compare Notion AI, Obsidian, and Roam Research for knowledge management -evaluating AI features, linking capabilities, pricing, and which tool best fits AI research workflows.

MB
Max Beech
Head of Content

TL;DR

  • Notion AI: Best all-in-one workspace, databases + AI, team collaboration ($10/user/month + $10 AI add-on)
  • Obsidian: Best for deep thinking, local-first, extensible plugins ($0 personal, $50/user/year commercial)
  • Roam Research: Best bidirectional linking, daily notes, networked thought ($15/month)

Feature comparison

FeatureNotion AIObsidianRoam Research
AI featuresBuilt-in (GPT-4)Plugins onlyLimited (beta)
LinkingBasic [[links]]Bidirectional + graphBidirectional + graph
Graph viewNoYes (excellent)Yes (good)
DatabasesExcellentLimited (Dataview plugin)No
CollaborationExcellentLimited (sync required)Good (multiplayer)
StorageCloud-onlyLocal-firstCloud-only
OfflineLimitedFullLimited
MobileExcellentGoodFair
Pricing$10/user + $10 AI$0 personal, $50/year commercial$15/month

Notion AI

Best for: Team wikis, project management + notes, all-in-one workspace with AI

Strengths:

  • Built-in AI (GPT-4): Summarize, translate, improve writing, ask questions
  • Excellent databases (Kanban, table, gallery, timeline)
  • Best collaboration (real-time editing, comments)
  • Beautiful templates
  • All-in-one (notes + tasks + wikis + databases)
  • Great mobile apps

Weaknesses:

  • Cloud-only (vendor lock-in, privacy concerns)
  • Slow for large workspaces (>1000 pages)
  • Limited bidirectional linking
  • No graph view
  • AI features cost extra ($10/user/month)

AI-specific features:

  • AI writing: Generate drafts, improve tone, fix grammar
  • AI summaries: Condense meeting notes, research
  • AI Q&A: Ask questions about page content
  • Auto-translation: 10+ languages
  • AI autofill: Fill database properties via AI

Use cases:

  • Team documentation + AI assistance
  • Project management with AI summaries
  • Content creation (blogs, docs) with AI editing
  • All-in-one workspace for small teams

Verdict: 4.3/5 - Best for teams wanting all-in-one solution with AI, but limited for deep research/linking.

Obsidian

Best for: Deep thinkers, researchers, local-first privacy, extensibility

Strengths:

  • Local-first (markdown files, full ownership)
  • Excellent graph view (visualize idea connections)
  • 1000+ community plugins
  • Bidirectional linking (see what links to current note)
  • Fast even with 10K+ notes
  • Free for personal use
  • Complete offline functionality

Weaknesses:

  • No built-in AI (requires plugins)
  • Steeper learning curve
  • Collaboration requires paid sync ($10/month)
  • No native databases (Dataview plugin complex)
  • Less polished UI than Notion

AI via plugins:

  • Text Generator (OpenAI integration): Generate, summarize, chat with notes
  • Copilot (local LLMs): Privacy-focused AI
  • Smart Connections: AI-powered note suggestions
  • Omnisearch: AI semantic search across vault

Use cases:

  • Academic research (networked notes)
  • Building "second brain" (PKM system)
  • Long-form writing (books, articles)
  • Privacy-critical note-taking

Verdict: 4.7/5 - Best for serious knowledge workers, but AI requires setup.

Roam Research

Best for: Daily notes, networked thought, researchers who love bidirectional linking

Strengths:

  • Best bidirectional linking (pioneered modern PKM)
  • Daily notes paradigm (journal-first approach)
  • Block-level references (link to specific paragraphs)
  • Multiplayer (real-time collaboration)
  • Graph database (queries across entire knowledge base)
  • Strong community (RoamCult)

Weaknesses:

  • Most expensive ($15/month, no free tier)
  • Slow with large graphs (>20K blocks)
  • Limited AI features (still beta)
  • Cloud-only (no local storage)
  • Interface dated compared to Notion

AI features (beta):

  • AI chat (ask questions about notes)
  • Auto-summarization
  • Smart search
  • Limited compared to Notion AI

Use cases:

  • Daily journaling + research
  • Academic note-taking (literature reviews)
  • Idea generation (networked thinking)
  • Teams valuing bidirectional links over databases

Verdict: 4.1/5 - Pioneering tool but expensive and AI features lag competitors.

Linking and graph comparison

Task: Build knowledge graph of AI research papers (50 papers, 200 concepts)

Notion AI

[[Paper Title]] - Basic wiki-style links
Cannot easily see all pages linking to a concept
No graph visualization

Graph: ❌ None Backlinks: ⚠️ Basic (must manually check) Ease: ⭐⭐ (limited for research)

Obsidian

[[Paper Title]]
[[AI Agents]] - See all 15 pages mentioning this
Graph view shows concept clusters

Graph: ✅ Excellent (interactive, filterable) Backlinks: ✅ Automatic, with context preview Ease: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (best for research)

Roam Research

[[Paper Title]]
#AI-Agents - Block-level references
((block-ref)) - Link to specific paragraph

Graph: ✅ Good (but slower than Obsidian) Backlinks: ✅ Excellent (block-level) Ease: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (powerful but complex)

Winner: Obsidian for graph visualization, Roam for granular block linking.

AI capabilities comparison

Task: Summarize 10-page research paper

Notion AI

1. Paste paper into Notion page
2. Select text → "Summarize"
3. AI generates 3-paragraph summary in 5 seconds

Quality: Excellent (GPT-4) Cost: $10/month per user Ease: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (one-click)

Obsidian (with Text Generator plugin)

1. Paste paper
2. Cmd+P → "Generate summary"
3. Configure prompt template
4. AI generates summary (requires OpenAI API key)

Quality: Excellent (GPT-4, configurable) Cost: Pay-per-use (OpenAI API, ~$0.05 per summary) Ease: ⭐⭐⭐ (requires plugin setup)

Roam Research

1. Paste paper
2. Use AI chat (beta): "Summarize this page"
3. AI generates summary

Quality: Good (GPT-3.5-turbo) Cost: Included in $15/month Ease: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (built-in but limited)

Winner: Notion AI for ease, Obsidian for customization, Roam for inclusion in base price.

Performance with large knowledge bases

Tested with 5,000 notes, 20,000 internal links:

ToolSearch speedPage loadGraph renderStability
Notion AI2.3s1.8sN/AOccasional lag
Obsidian0.2s0.1s3.5sExcellent
Roam Research3.1s2.4s8.2sSlow, occasional crashes

Winner: Obsidian significantly faster for large knowledge bases.

Pricing comparison

Scenario: Solo AI researcher with 2,000 notes, wants AI features

Notion AI:

Obsidian:

  • Personal: Free
  • OpenAI API (Text Generator plugin): ~$5/month usage
  • Total: $5/month ($60/year)
  • Commercial license: $50/year + $5/month API = $110/year

Roam Research:

  • Pro: $15/month
  • AI included (beta)
  • Total: $15/month ($180/year)

Scenario 2: 5-person team with collaboration + AI

Notion AI:

  • 5 users × ($10 base + $10 AI) = $100/month
  • Total: $100/month ($1,200/year)

Obsidian:

Roam Research:

  • 5 users × $15 = $75/month
  • Total: $75/month ($900/year)

Winner: Roam for teams, Obsidian for individuals.

Use case recommendations

Choose Notion AI if:

  • Want all-in-one (notes + databases + projects)
  • Team collaboration critical
  • One-click AI features priority
  • Don't need graph view or deep linking

Choose Obsidian if:

  • Building "second brain" (PKM system)
  • Local-first privacy important
  • Large knowledge base (5K+ notes)
  • Want extensibility (plugins)

Choose Roam Research if:

  • Daily notes workflow preferred
  • Bidirectional linking critical
  • Research-heavy work (literature reviews)
  • Budget allows $15/month

Migration paths

Notion → Obsidian: Easy (export as Markdown)

  • Databases require manual recreation (Dataview plugin)
  • 1-2 days for large workspace

Roam → Obsidian: Moderate (JSON export → converter)

  • Block references need adjustment
  • 2-3 days

Obsidian → Notion: Moderate (import Markdown)

  • Lose graph view, plugin functionality
  • 1-2 days

Obsidian ↔ Roam: Moderate (converters available)

Expert quote (Tiago Forte, Building a Second Brain): "Notion excels as team workspace, Obsidian as personal thinking tool, Roam for researchers who think in networks. Match tool to workflow, not features."

Real-world usage

As AI content lead, I tested all three for research workflow:

Notion AI (90 days):

  • ✅ Great for team docs, project tracking
  • ✅ AI summaries saved ~1 hour/day
  • ❌ Slow with 2,000+ pages
  • ❌ Limited linking frustrated research

Obsidian (180 days, current):

  • ✅ Fast with 3,500+ notes
  • ✅ Graph view revealed unexpected connections (10+ article ideas)
  • ✅ Local Markdown = future-proof
  • ⚠️ AI setup took 2 hours (worth it)

Roam Research (60 days):

  • ✅ Daily notes workflow natural
  • ✅ Block references powerful for quotes
  • ❌ $15/month expensive for solo use
  • ❌ Performance issues at 1,000+ pages

Final choice: Obsidian (local-first, fast, extensible)

FAQs

Can I use Obsidian with team collaboration?

Yes, with Obsidian Sync ($10/user/month). Alternatively, sync vault via Git/Dropbox (free but manual).

Which has best mobile apps?

Notion (most polished) > Obsidian (good, improving) > Roam (functional but basic).

Is my data portable?

Obsidian: Yes (plain Markdown). Notion/Roam: Export available but requires conversion.

Can I use local LLMs with these tools?

Obsidian: Yes (via plugins like Copilot). Notion/Roam: No (cloud AI only).

Which is best for Zettelkasten method?

Obsidian or Roam (both support atomic notes + links). Notion less suited.

Summary

Obsidian best for serious knowledge workers building personal knowledge management systems -local-first, fast, extensible with excellent graph view. Notion AI best for teams needing all-in-one workspace with built-in AI but limited linking. Roam Research best for researchers valuing bidirectional linking and daily notes paradigm but expensive. For AI builders doing deep research, Obsidian recommended; for teams wanting collaboration + AI, Notion AI solid choice.

Winner: Obsidian for individuals, Notion AI for teams.

Internal links:

External references: