17 SaaS Pricing Experiments: 12 Failures, 5 Winners (What We Learned)
Real pricing experiment data from 17 tests over 18 months. What increased revenue, what tanked conversions, and the 5 winning strategies we're keeping.

Real pricing experiment data from 17 tests over 18 months. What increased revenue, what tanked conversions, and the 5 winning strategies we're keeping.

TL;DR
Pricing is terrifying. Change it wrong and revenue tanks. Change it right and growth accelerates.
We ran 17 pricing experiments over 18 months. Changed tier structures, pricing models, discount strategies, trial lengths, and more.
Some worked brilliantly. Most failed. All taught us something.
This is the complete breakdown: what we tested, the exact results, what we learned, and the 5 changes we're keeping permanently.
Our product: B2B SaaS platform (workflow automation)
Starting pricing (Month 0):
Starting metrics:
The goal: Increase revenue without destroying conversion rates.
"Focus is the ultimate competitive advantage. The companies that win are the ones saying no to 99% of opportunities to double down on the 1% that matters." - Naval Ravikant, Founder of AngelList
Hypothesis: Offering 20% discount for annual payment will increase annual signups and improve cash flow.
What we tested:
Duration: 90 days
Results:
| Metric | Before | After | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly signups | 78 | 74 | -5% |
| Annual signups | 12 | 53 | +342% |
| Monthly → Annual % | 13% | 42% | +223% |
| Average customer LTV | £420 | £680 | +62% |
| Cash collected upfront | £3,336 | £14,734 | +342% |
Why it worked:
What we learned: Annual customers are better customers:
Kept permanently: ✅
Hypothesis: Free tier cannibalizes paid signups. Remove it to force conversions.
What we tested:
Duration: 60 days
Results:
| Metric | Before | After | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trial signups | 420 | 180 | -57% |
| Trial → Paid conversion | 8% | 14% | +75% |
| Total paid conversions | 34 | 25 | -26% |
| MRR | £1,240 | £945 | -24% |
Why it failed:
What we learned: Free tier serves as:
Reversed after 60 days: ❌
Hypothesis: We're underpriced. Raising prices will increase revenue without major conversion drop.
What we tested:
Duration: 120 days
Results:
| Metric | Before | After | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trial → Paid conversion (Starter) | 8% | 9.4% | +18% |
| Trial → Paid conversion (Professional) | 3% | 3.6% | +20% |
| Average MRR per customer | £42 | £58 | +38% |
| Total MRR | £1,240 | £1,798 | +45% |
| Churn rate | 6.2% | 5.8% | -6% |
Why it worked:
Surprising finding: Conversion rate increased after price increase.
Theory: Price signals quality. £39/mo feels like "real business tool." £29/mo feels like "toy."
Kept permanently: ✅
Hypothesis: Custom pricing for enterprise creates perception of flexibility and captures high-value deals.
What we tested:
Duration: 90 days
Results:
| Metric | Before | After | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise page views | 280 | 290 | +4% |
| Enterprise demo requests | 18 | 6 | -67% |
| Enterprise signups | 4 | 1 | -75% |
| Enterprises "Contact Sales" clicks | N/A | 22 | New |
| Enterprises that actually emailed | N/A | 6 | 27% follow-through |
Why it failed:
What we learned: "Contact Sales" only works when:
For SMB SaaS: Show the damn price.
Reversed after 90 days: ❌
Hypothesis: Customers exceed their task limits but don't upgrade. Offer auto-upgrade or overage fee.
What we tested:
Duration: 120 days
Results:
| Metric | Before | After | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customers hitting limits | 42/month | 48/month | +14% |
| Customers upgrading to next tier | 8 (19%) | 12 (25%) | +31% |
| Customers buying overage | N/A | 18 (38%) | New |
| Additional MRR from overages | £0 | £180 | New |
| Churn due to hitting limits | 6/month | 2/month | -67% |
Why it worked:
What we learned: Usage-based pricing works when:
Kept permanently: ✅
Hypothesis: 14 days is too long. Customers who convert do so in first 7 days anyway.
What we tested:
Duration: 60 days
Results:
| Metric | Before | After | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trial signups | 420 | 440 | +5% |
| Trial → Paid conversion | 8% | 4.2% | -47% |
| Activation rate (used core feature) | 42% | 28% | -33% |
| Time to activation (average) | 9 days | 6 days | -33% (but...) |
Why it failed:
What we learned: Trial length should match:
Our product: Activation took average 9 days → 14-day trial is appropriate.
Reversed after 60 days: ❌
Hypothesis: Social proof nudges undecided buyers toward profitable mid-tier.
What we tested:
Duration: 90 days
Results:
| Metric | Before | After | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter signups | 68 | 52 | -24% |
| Professional signups | 18 | 38 | +111% |
| Enterprise signups | 4 | 4 | 0% |
| Average revenue per signup | £44 | £62 | +41% |
| Total MRR | £1,240 | £1,782 | +44% |
Why it worked:
What we learned: "Most Popular" is effective when:
Kept permanently: ✅
Hypothesis: Gap between £39 and £99 is too big. Add £59 "Growth" tier to capture mid-market.
What we tested:
Duration: 90 days
Results:
| Metric | Before | After | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter signups | 68 | 58 | -15% |
| Growth signups | N/A | 32 | New |
| Professional signups | 18 | 8 | -56% |
| Enterprise signups | 4 | 3 | -25% |
| Average revenue per signup | £54 | £51 | -6% |
Why it failed:
What we learned: 3 tiers is optimal for SaaS:
4+ tiers confuses buyers. Stick to 3.
Reversed after 90 days: ❌
Hypothesis: More generous free tier will drive faster growth, convert at same rate.
What we tested:
Duration: 120 days
Results:
| Metric | Before | After | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free signups | 1,240 | 1,680 | +35% |
| Free → Paid conversion | 8% | 3.2% | -60% |
| Paid signups (absolute) | 99 | 54 | -45% |
| Support burden | Low | High | 2.4x tickets/user |
Why it failed:
What we learned: Free tier should be:
Sweet spot for us: 100 tasks/month (enough to try meaningfully, not enough to rely on)
Reversed after 120 days: ❌
Hypothesis: Show starting price for Enterprise, reduce friction.
What we tested:
Duration: 90 days
Results:
| Metric | Before | After | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise page CTR | 2.1% | 4.8% | +129% |
| Enterprise demo requests | 6 | 22 | +267% |
| Enterprise signups | 1 | 8 | +700% |
| Average Enterprise deal size | £480 | £420 | -13% |
Why it worked:
Trade-off: Average deal size decreased (some self-served at £299 instead of negotiating £500+)
Net result: 8x more enterprise customers at slightly lower ACV = 6.8x more revenue
Kept permanently: ✅
#6: Monthly commitment only (no annual option)
#7: Free trial with credit card required
#8: Tiered discounts (5% off 2-5 users, 10% off 6-10 users)
#9: Feature-based pricing (pay per feature)
#10: Lower entry price (£19/mo Starter)
#11: 30-day money-back guarantee
#12: Limited-time discount (20% off for first 100 customers)
After 17 experiments, here's what actually matters:
The insight: Customers don't know if £39 or £99 is "fair." They judge based on signals.
How to increase perceived value:
The insight: 3 tiers beats 4 tiers. Simple beats complex.
Simplicity guidelines:
The insight: Annual customers are better in every way.
| Metric | Monthly | Annual | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Churn rate | 6.2% | 2.8% | Annual |
| Engagement | Medium | High | Annual |
| LTV | £420 | £680 | Annual |
| CAC payback | 8 months | 2 months | Annual |
How to drive annual:
The insight: Free tier's job is conversion, not serving free users long-term.
Free tier design:
The insight: If you change 3 things and revenue goes up, which one drove it?
Testing discipline:
The insight: Pricing isn't just math, it's psychology.
What to ask:
Surprising finding: 40% of customers said they would have paid more. We were leaving money on table.
After 17 experiments, here's our current pricing:
Free Plan:
Starter Plan: ⭐ £39/month or £375/year (20% off)
Professional Plan: 🔥 Most Popular
Enterprise Plan:
The results after all experiments:
| Metric | Before Experiments (Month 0) | After Experiments (Month 18) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly MRR | £1,240 | £4,680 | +277% |
| Free → Paid conversion | 8% | 11.2% | +40% |
| Monthly → Annual % | 12% | 42% | +250% |
| Average LTV | £420 | £780 | +86% |
| Churn rate | 6.2% | 4.8% | -23% |
Want to run your own pricing experiments? Here's the playbook:
Metrics to track:
Get 30+ days of baseline data before testing anything.
High-impact tests to try first:
Lower priority:
For each experiment:
During test:
Red flags to stop early:
Questions to answer:
Decision:
Create pricing experiment log:
| Test # | Hypothesis | Duration | Result | Decision | Learnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Annual discount increases signups | 90 days | +342% annual signups | Keep ✅ | Annual customers are better |
| 2 | Remove free tier | 60 days | -26% conversions | Reverse ❌ | Free tier is acquisition tool |
Share with team so institutional knowledge persists.
Want AI to help you design and analyze pricing experiments? Athenic can model pricing scenarios, track experiment results, and recommend optimizations based on your data -taking the guesswork out of pricing strategy. See how it works →
Related reading:
Q: How do I measure success?
Define success metrics before you start, baseline your current state, and track progress consistently. Focus on outcomes that matter to the business, not just activity metrics.
Q: How do I get started with implementing this?
Start with a small pilot project that addresses a specific, measurable problem. Document results, gather feedback, and use that learning to inform a broader rollout. Small wins build momentum and stakeholder confidence.
Q: What resources do I need to succeed?
Success requires clear ownership, adequate time allocation, and willingness to iterate. Most initiatives fail not from lack of tools or budget, but from lack of dedicated attention and realistic timelines.