Analysis of CNBC report on Microsoft Copilot's slower-than-expected enterprise adoption -pricing concerns, value clarity, and lessons for AI product builders.
The News: CNBC reported that Microsoft Copilot adoption is slower than anticipated despite Microsoft's enterprise dominance. Key finding: companies are hesitant about the £30/user/month pricing without clear ROI demonstration.
Why This Matters: Microsoft bet big on Copilot as its AI monet ization play. Slow adoption signals that enterprise AI products need more than brand recognition -they need demonstrable value and reasonable pricing.
What Went Wrong:
1. Pricing perception issues £30/user/month = £360/year per employee. For 1,000-person company: £360,000 annually. CFOs want proof of 10-15% productivity gains to justify. Microsoft hasn't provided clear ROI framework.
2. Unclear value proposition Generic "AI assistant" positioning doesn't resonate. Enterprises ask: "What specific workflows does this replace? What hours does it save?" Microsoft's answer remains vague.
3. IT complexity Deployment requires M365 admin configuration, security reviews, data governance policies. Not simple "turn on and use."
Lessons for AI Product Builders:
What Microsoft Should Do: Launch verticalized Copilots (Copilot for Sales, Copilot for Finance) with use-case-specific pricing (£10/user/month per use case). Demonstrate ROI: "Save 5 hours/week on expense reports = £2,600/year value at £120 cost."
Sources: