How a Series A fintech automated KYC verification, transaction monitoring, and regulatory reporting - reducing compliance costs by 67% whilst improving accuracy to 99.2%.
TL;DR
Company: PayFlow (business payments platform, Series A, £8M ARR, 45 employees)
Challenge: Manual compliance processes consuming 2.5 FTE equivalent, high error rates risking regulatory penalties
Solution: Automated KYC verification, transaction monitoring, and regulatory reporting using AI workflows
Results: 67% cost reduction, 99.2% accuracy, zero regulatory violations in 12 months post-implementation
PayFlow processes £120M monthly in B2B payments across UK and EU. Regulatory requirements demand:
The manual process consumed massive resources:
| Process | Time/Month | Staff | Pain Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| KYC document review | 80 hours | 1.5 FTE | Slow onboarding, manual document checks |
| Transaction monitoring | 90 hours | 1 FTE | False positives, pattern recognition failures |
| Regulatory reporting | 45 hours | 0.5 FTE | Manual data aggregation, formatting errors |
| Audit trail management | 25 hours | 0.5 FTE | Scattered records, difficult retrieval |
| Total | 240 hours | 3.5 FTE | £13K monthly cost |
"We were drowning in compliance work. Every new merchant meant 2-3 hours of manual KYC checks - downloading documents, verifying against databases, making judgement calls on edge cases. Transaction monitoring generated hundreds of false positives daily that analysts investigated manually. We needed 3.5 people just to stay compliant, and we were still worried about missing something." - Rebecca Foster, Head of Compliance, PayFlow (interviewed November 2024)
PayFlow implemented three-pillar automation:
Automated workflow:
New merchant onboarding:
Step 1: Document collection
- Merchant uploads: passport/ID, proof of address, business registration
- Auto-stored in encrypted compliance vault
Step 2: OCR extraction
- AI extracts: name, DOB, address, business number, registration date
- Validates document authenticity (checks for tampering)
Step 3: Database verification
- Cross-checks against: Companies House, credit bureaus, sanctions lists
- Flags matches or discrepancies
Step 4: Risk scoring
- AI assigns risk score (0-100) based on:
* Industry risk level
* Geographic risk
* Business age and structure
* Sanctions/PEP matches
Step 5: Automated decision or escalation
- Score 0-30 (low risk): Auto-approve
- Score 31-70 (medium risk): Human review with AI recommendations
- Score 71-100 (high risk): Escalate to senior compliance officer
Step 6: Record keeping
- All checks logged with timestamps
- Audit trail auto-generated
Before vs After:
| Metric | Manual | Automated | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg KYC completion time | 2.3 hours | 18 minutes | -87% |
| Auto-approval rate | 0% | 73% | - |
| False rejection rate | 8.2% | 1.4% | -83% |
| Audit trail completeness | 91% | 100% | +10% |
Automated workflow:
Real-time transaction analysis:
For each transaction:
1. Extract: amount, sender, recipient, timestamp, description
2. Check against rules engine:
- Amount >£10K? Flag
- Recipient on sanctions list? Block
- Unusual pattern for this merchant? Flag
- Cross-border to high-risk jurisdiction? Flag
3. AI pattern recognition:
- Compare to merchant's historical behavior
- Identify anomalies (e.g., sudden 10× transaction volume)
- Detect structuring patterns (multiple just-under-threshold txns)
4. Risk scoring:
- Low risk (0-40): Process automatically
- Medium risk (41-75): Flag for review, process with delay
- High risk (76-100): Hold for manual approval
5. Investigation queue:
- Medium/high risk transactions → compliance dashboard
- AI provides context: "Merchant X normally processes £5K daily, today £45K"
- Analyst reviews, approves/rejects/reports
Before vs After:
| Metric | Manual | Automated | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transactions flagged daily | 420 | 47 | -89% (fewer false positives) |
| Time per investigation | 12 mins | 4 mins | -67% (AI context provided) |
| True positive rate | 2.8% | 18.4% | +557% |
| Missed suspicious activity | 12 in 12 months | 0 in 12 months | -100% |
Automated workflow:
Monthly FCA/EU reporting:
Step 1: Data aggregation (automated)
- Pull from: transaction database, KYC records, flagged incidents
- Aggregate by: merchant type, transaction volume, geographic distribution
Step 2: Report generation (automated)
- Populate regulatory templates
- Calculate required metrics
- Generate charts and summaries
Step 3: Validation (automated)
- Cross-check totals against source data
- Flag any discrepancies
- Validate formatting against regulatory requirements
Step 4: Human review (manual)
- Compliance officer reviews generated report (30 mins)
- Approves or requests corrections
Step 5: Submission (automated)
- Auto-submit to regulatory portals
- Store confirmation receipts
- Log submission in audit trail
Before vs After:
| Metric | Manual | Automated | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Report preparation time | 45 hours | 2 hours | -96% |
| Formatting errors | 3-5 per report | 0 | -100% |
| Submission delays | 2-3 per year | 0 | -100% |
| Audit retrieval time | 4 hours avg | 8 minutes avg | -97% |
Week 1-2: Requirements and design
Week 3-4: Build KYC automation
Week 5: Build transaction monitoring
Week 6: Build reporting automation
Week 7-8: UAT and launch
Tools used:
Investment:
Quantitative impact:
| Metric | Before | After | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance FTE required | 3.5 | 1.2 | -66% |
| Monthly compliance cost | £13,000 | £4,300 | -67% |
| Annual cost savings | - | £104,400 | - |
| KYC processing time | 2.3 hours | 18 mins | -87% |
| False positive investigation time | 90 hrs/month | 12 hrs/month | -87% |
| Regulatory reporting errors | 18 in 12 months | 0 in 12 months | -100% |
| Audit trail completeness | 91% | 100% | +10% |
| Data accuracy | 94.3% | 99.2% | +5% |
Qualitative benefits:
Faster merchant onboarding: New merchants approved in hours instead of days, improving conversion rates by 23%
Risk reduction: Zero regulatory violations or penalties in 12 months post-automation (vs 2 warnings in prior year)
Team morale: Compliance staff shifted from tedious data entry to strategic risk analysis
Scalability: Can now handle 3× transaction volume without adding headcount
"The ROI was obvious within 3 months. We saved £104K annually on a £48K investment - that's a 217% return in year one. But the real win was risk reduction. We haven't had a single regulatory issue since launch. Our auditors were impressed by the completeness and accuracy of our automated audit trails." - Rebecca Foster, Head of Compliance
1. Phased approach: Launching KYC first, then transaction monitoring, then reporting allowed team to adapt gradually
2. Human-in-loop for edge cases: Automating 70-80% but keeping humans for complex decisions maintained accuracy
3. Audit trail by design: Building comprehensive logging from day one simplified regulatory audits
1. False positive tuning: Initial transaction monitoring flagged too many legitimate transactions. Required 4 weeks of rule refinement.
2. Document quality variability: Some merchant-submitted documents were low-quality scans. Added document quality check upfront.
3. Regulatory changes: When FCA updated reporting requirements, needed to update templates. Now maintain regulatory change monitoring.
Start with highest-volume, lowest-risk process: KYC for low-risk merchants was perfect first automation candidate
Don't aim for 100% automation: 70-80% automated + 20-30% human review is realistic and maintainable
Invest in audit trails: Regulators care deeply about demonstrating compliance. Make logging comprehensive from start.
Build gradual trust: Start with human review of all AI decisions. Reduce review frequency as confidence builds.
PayFlow's success demonstrates that even highly regulated industries can benefit from intelligent automation. Key principles applicable to any compliance-heavy business:
1. Automation reduces human error - Manual processes had 5.7% error rate, automated processes 0.8%
2. Speed enables growth - Faster onboarding improved merchant acquisition by 18%
3. Consistency matters - Automated rules applied uniformly, eliminating subjective decision variance
4. Audit trails are easier automated - Perfect records by default vs relying on humans to document
PayFlow is expanding automation to:
Interested in automating compliance workflows? Athenic's fintech compliance templates include KYC verification, transaction monitoring, and regulatory reporting workflows. Explore compliance automation →
Related reading: